
I'm foregoing all apologies this time.
I suck. I haven't kept my commitment.
But I'm back now.
I'm probably going to get into another blog right after this one because I'm log-jammed due to the lack of writing.
Let's first begin with the perceived persecution of Michael Vick. The former Virginia Tech super-star and NFL's highest-paid player has received a conditional reinstatement and an additional 5-game suspension to start the 2009 football season.
I've been sort of torn between the two-sides of this argument in the past few weeks. At first I thought that an additional suspension would be overkill. You could make the argument it constitutes double-jeopardy (not in the legal sense, of course).
But the more I think about it, the more appropriate I think this is. Goodell essentially put Vick in a 5-week probationary period. It's only a suspension by name.
He can sign with a team today... like right now. He can participate in all team activities, earn a paycheck and he can even play in the final two preseason games. Goodell is essentially creating a hyper-controlled environment for Vick's transition back into the league. Which will probably benefit both parties in the long run.
What more was Vick going to do anyway? He has missed two full seasons. He's far from being in game shape, and the speed of the NFL game is not something to which a player can acclimate himself very quickly; especially when time has been creeping by in a prison cell for the past two years.
The reality of the situation is that all 32 NFL teams may pass on Michael Vick. He may end up playing in Canada or in the UFL when it's all said and done. I'm not sure how likely that is considering what Vick could potentially bring to a team in in the second half of the season. But I'm also not sure how favorably any NFL franchise is going to look upon the guaranteed media circus, the possible lost sponsorships, and PETA demonstrators outside of every practice and game.
So what is he complaining about? Apparently the "Vick Camp" is devastated by the decision and says that he will re-apply for full reinstatement no later than week one, citing Goodell's decision as "excessive."
Really?
Vick gets to play football again and get paid for it (league minimum for Vick is in the neighborhood of $620,000), but somehow that's not good enough?
Do they know who is going to review Roger Goodell's decision if they appeal?
The NFL Commissioner, Roger Goodell.
Goodell is extending Vick's suspension to protect the NFL brand; to keep his league popular and its teams profitable. The Commissioner is going hold tight on the reins, and he will not let this Vick situation harm the league's image if he can avoid it. He's going to protect the reputation of his league, Michael Vick's bank account and legacy be damned.

Terrell Owens struck another nerve with me today, and it begs the question:
Can we please stop using words and phrases like "deserves" and "has a right" when referring to Michael Vick playing football?
Vick may have a right to make a living, but he certainly doesn't "have a right" to play again in the NFL. Even he admitted that playing professional football is a privilege.
If Katie Couric were fired from the CBS Evening News for bankrolling a prostitution ring, do you think we'd be talking about her reinstatement? Do you think she'd call up the President of the company on the day of her release and ask him what time she should be in studio to read the news?
The rules may be different for athletes and celebrities, but Michael Vick isn't entitled to a damn thing. And it certainly isn't Roger Goodell's problem that all Vick can do is play football.
T.O. said that Vick has "suffered enough." No. He has been serving a sentence and receiving punishment for a crime that he deliberately committed and subsequently lied about. Repeatedly.
The most obnoxious thing that Vick advocates say is, "he made a mistake, and he's paid for it."
No, no, no. Plaxico Burress made a mistake. He didn't mean to shoot himself in the leg.
By all accounts, Vick electrocuted, hanged, strangled, drowned, and repeatedly slammed dogs into the ground if they didn't perform in the ring.
That's sociopathic behavior at it's finest. That's the stuff that serial killers are made of.
Michael Vick didn't make a mistake. He made conscious decisions to fund and partake in the brutal execution of helpless animals. As far as remorse is concerned, the only bit that he's conveyed to the public was in the post-conviction statement that his publicist wrote for him.
At the end of the day, I guess, the bottom line is this:
Let Mike play in week 6. If so many of these other delinquents deserve 2nd and 3rd chances then he certainly does too. Maybe he'll be able to resurrect his career and lead a good life. I hope so for his family's sake.
I'll put my money on the fact that he hasn't changed very much though.
Reports and eyewitnesses put him at a strip club last week with Allen Iverson. I'm not condemning him for going to a strip club. We've all been once. It probably wasn't the best PR move though.
(By the way, I don't have any actual proof that he was there... but this is a blog so I don't have to.)








